Mies Hong Kong, might be somewhat tagged.
This question after long debate was settled in 1852 against the Colony "his Government, and that it might be more prudent to ascertain, by Governor, reference to the new Robinson, what is the actual loss which the Colony our concession of the principle, and would sustain by whether the Colony can bear it.
W Blackwood, I think it is Which it is ABP-24 June. Attendance. I appeal to the former consideration of 1852, mentioned by the bar Bifst Wo Wortesque again in 1858 Si J Bowring raises it without adverting at all to the former decision (Lee 10,044).
In the debate to which I allude (I have the bound volumes in my room for reference) the Treasury supported the Colonial against us, and prevailed on the other side.
No doubt there is to be said on both sides. If (as I understand the case from these minutes) the land in question might by the Gov't for military purposes, be coupled with Intan is dealt with as a separate district in hue a good deal.
The Colonial argument is this - The Colonial revenue proceeds in great measure from ground rents. The Ordinance purchases land which pays...
Page information is not detected in this text, if it is, please provide more context.
has been removed and the content is formatted according to the rules. The text is now in HTML format usingfor paragraphs. Spelling corrections and spacing fixes have been made. The original scan's character, space, line break, and page number line have been preserved as much as possible. Markdown formatting is not used. File references are formatted without spaces inside parentheses. However, there was no file reference in the original text to correct. The text has been reordered to make sense and some obvious OCR errors have been corrected.
by 3 coloring of
Mies
Hong Kong, might be somewhat taged.
2
осех о
quitting
8
binh rong ong
452
7
Mr FortiFeue
This question after long debale
buy a
a
lous settled in 1852.
against the Colony
"his Government, and that it might be more prudent to ascutain, by
Governor, reference to the new Robinson, what is the actual toss
which the Colony our concession of the principle, and
would sustain bey
whether the Colony
can bear it.
W Blackwoord, I think it is
Which it is ABP-24 June. Attandene.
decirath I upe to the former
coustondan of 1852, mentioned of the bar Bifst
Wo Wortesque
agai
in 1858
Si J Booring raises it without adverting at all to the formen
decision (Lee 10,044)
In the debate
to which I allude
(I
I have the bound volumes in
my
room
for reference)
love
side.
The Reasury
and prevailed.
supported the Colonial against us,
were
No doubt there is
vm fum 27
to be said on
both sides.
use
If (a) indusland the case from there minutes) the land in question : might by the Hoan for. out of 2pm funds, fu military purposes, Jean couplepon with
Intan is daal operere distent i hue
a
Cuban area alish
(intend)
a
good deal
The Colonial argument is this-
The Colonial
Measure
revenue proceeds in great
from ground rents.
The
Orduance purchase land which pays
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.